March for Science has gone full SJW

The SJWs and the march for science movement have gone full retard.
Never go full retard.
After recent controversy over enlisting the help of Bill Nye to promote and lead the march, many SJW cupcakes, snowflakes, and the like have lost their collective mind over the march DARING to allow a STRAIGHT WHITE MALE to lead the march.
the science march has gone full sjw. I did a video on this a while back, the science march was originally meant to be
the science community standing up for misconceptions in politics & public discourse, but we should have known better than
to believe something that SOUNDS nice. That's how the left operates, they appeal to your petty emotions in order
to make it SEEM like they're "fighting for a good cause." It's all that "greater good" bullshit that the Soviet Union
and Nazi Germany peddled in the late 30s into the mid 40s, and people STILL believe that they're trying to do the
"right" thing.
Here's the march for science homepage. First, i'd like to highlight the emotional appeal in the very first paragraph
on their website. No one gives a fuck about diversity except racists like the modern SJWs.
Being of a certain background does not mean your ideas or perspective is inherently valid, that's the entire point
of the "perception vs reality" mantra. The only thing science actually cares about is either proving or disproving its
theories and expanding its own knowledge, and ethnic background has NO effect on the validity of scientific theories.
For you to even suggest that it does, makes YOU the racist.
The march for science has begun calling BILL NYE a racist. At that moment, everyone should realize what the movement
is ACTUALLY about. Their racism has shifted from all-white, to all-color and they have the audacity to call
everyone ELSE bigoted because we refuse to buy into their bullshit dogma?
And they even have the nerve to call their bullshit dogma the "belief in evidence-based policies" which is not only
fucking psychotic to say unironically, but it's also fundamentally invalid.

I made a video on this around a month ago, and I should've known that it was going to turn out this way.
I hope you enjoyed the video, and I hope it gets you interested in looking through exactly how full of shit these people are
Follow me on Twitter, like/share the video and please leave a comment about anything I may have missed or any ideas
on stories I can do or what I can do to help improve my content. I appreciate the view, and I'll see you next time!

Send articles or topics that you would like me to make a video about on Twitter: @TheSourSage

I’m also on Minds.com if you’d like to check out my dismal page there: https://www.minds.com/TheSourSage

Vid.me: https://vid.me/TheSourSage

DailyMotion: http://www.dailymotion.com/soursage

If you would like your content to be removed from my videos, contact me on twitter or at sagethesour@gmail.com

Sources:

https://archive.fo/F1E1b

https://www.marchforscience.com/

https://www.buzzfeed.com/azeenghorayshi/march-for-science-diversity

http://louderwithcrowder.com/march-science-dilemma-bill-nye/

To see more insanity for yourself:
https://twitter.com/search?q=march%20for%20science&src=typd

Music:

Lazytown: We’re Number One
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PfYnvDL0Qcw

This video is protected under U.S. Title 17, Chapter 1, Article 107: Otherwise known as Fair Use:
Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include—
(1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes;
(2) the nature of the copyrighted work;
(3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and
(4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work.
The fact that a work is unpublished shall not itself bar a finding of fair use if such finding is made upon consideration of all the above factors.