HRM 595 Full Course Project

Purchase here


http://chosecourses.com/HRM%20595/hrm-595-full-course-project


Product Description

Course Project: Negotiation Analysis Paper
Objective
The purpose of the negotiation analysis paper is to help you transfer the negotiation concepts from the course to negotiations in your own organization. I would like you to use concepts learned in the course to analyze a negotiation situation. The negotiation may be one that has recently concluded or one that you are in the midst of. It may be a negotiation between organizations or within an organization. It may be a dyadic negotiation or one with multiple parties. It may be a situation of chronic conflict. It also may be a negotiation in which you observed and are familiar with the parties to the negotiations in order to conduct an analysis.
Guidelines
Paper (due in Week 7) must conform to APA format and be 13–15 pages in length, not including the title page, abstract and references. Spend no more than three pages describing the situation. Negotiation should be complex enough to challenge your analytic skills. Topic proposal due in Week 3 (one page).
Milestones:
Week 3 - The proposed topic for the project paper is due in Week 3 (20 points). The proposal should be an explanation of the chosen negotiation topic, the parties to the negotiation, and proposed areas of analysis including negotiation strategies and tactics used. The proposal should be one page. Week 7 - Final completed paper is due (130 points)
Grading Rubrics
HR595 NEGOTIATION SKILLS TERM PAPER
Total Points - 130
Criteria for Evaluating Written Assignments
Meets Expectations
Partially Meets Expectations
Fails to Meet Expectations
Points Earned
Intellectual Understanding
(20 Points)
Addresses all aspects of assignment in sufficient depth
Addresses most aspects of assignment in sufficient depth
Does not address most aspects of assignment and/or fails to do so in sufficient depth
Creativity
(20 Points)
Analyzes and discusses many negotiation concepts by extending and elaborating with realistic examples
Discusses with some analysis several negotiation concepts by extending and elaborating with realistic examples
Does not discuss negotiation concepts or apply them to realistic examples
Insight
(20 Points)
Exhibits a substantive and perceptive ability in analyzing and discussion negotiation topic that is the focus of the paper
Discusses assignment topic with some substance and evidence of perceptive ability
Does not exhibit perceptive ability in discussing the assignment topic
Validity
(20 Points)
The majority of opinions and analyses are rigorously supported by appropriate research.
Some opinions are supported by appropriate research but much is not supported
The majority of opinions and analysis is not supported by appropriate research
Intellectual Honesty
(20 Points)
All references are acknowledged and properly cited in APA format
Some references are acknowledged and properly cited in APA format
References are not properly acknowledged