Hosted by Dailymotion. For legal issues report at the Copyright Center, report us on DMC, or use the Instant Removal tool.
Who Are We?
Description
According to Haidt, we are the products of a complex evolutionary story that we do not fully grasp.
Jonathan Haidt: I think we are basically products of a complex evolutionary story that we don't fully grasp. We're caught debating. The scientists say we are primates. The religious side says we are children of God. And I think that literally speaking, of course, I think the scientists are right, but the scientists are so caught up in this reductionist approach to evolution in which we are individuals who evolved cooperation through reciprocity and kinship, and that's it, that most scientists now looking at evolution are very wary of the idea that actually group level selection shaped us.
Once you see that human groups have competed with each other for a long time, and you start thinking, well, what are the aspects of human nature that would lead to success in group competition? You realize in group loyalty, tribalism hierarchy, respect, ideas of purity and pollution, religion, these were crucial in binding us into cooperative groups.
This is where, I think, religious believers and conservatives are onto some truths that we, secular, liberal scientists, have a hard time accepting. They're truths nonetheless.
Recorded on May 9, 2008.
Jonathan Haidt: I think we are basically products of a complex evolutionary story that we don't fully grasp. We're caught debating. The scientists say we are primates. The religious side says we are children of God. And I think that literally speaking, of course, I think the scientists are right, but the scientists are so caught up in this reductionist approach to evolution in which we are individuals who evolved cooperation through reciprocity and kinship, and that's it, that most scientists now looking at evolution are very wary of the idea that actually group level selection shaped us.
Once you see that human groups have competed with each other for a long time, and you start thinking, well, what are the aspects of human nature that would lead to success in group competition? You realize in group loyalty, tribalism hierarchy, respect, ideas of purity and pollution, religion, these were crucial in binding us into cooperative groups.
This is where, I think, religious believers and conservatives are onto some truths that we, secular, liberal scientists, have a hard time accepting. They're truths nonetheless.
Recorded on May 9, 2008.
Jonathan Haidt: I think we are basically products of a complex evolutionary story that we don't fully grasp. We're caught debating. The scientists say we are primates. The religious side says we are children of God. And I think that literally speaking, of course, I think the scientists are right, but the scientists are so caught up in this reductionist approach to evolution in which we are individuals who evolved cooperation through reciprocity and kinship, and that's it, that most scientists now looking at evolution are very wary of the idea that actually group level selection shaped us.
Once you see that human groups have competed with each other for a long time, and you start thinking, well, what are the aspects of human nature that would lead to success in group competition? You realize in group loyalty, tribalism hierarchy, respect, ideas of purity and pollution, religion, these were crucial in binding us into cooperative groups.
This is where, I think, religious believers and conservatives are onto some truths that we, secular, liberal scientists, have a hard time accepting. They're truths nonetheless.
Recorded on May 9, 2008.
Jonathan Haidt: I think we are basically products of a complex evolutionary story that we don't fully grasp. We're caught debating. The scientists say we are primates. The religious side says we are children of God. And I think that literally speaking, of course, I think the scientists are right, but the scientists are so caught up in this reductionist approach to evolution in which we are individuals who evolved cooperation through reciprocity and kinship, and that's it, that most scientists now looking at evolution are very wary of the idea that actually group level selection shaped us.
Once you see that human groups have competed with each other for a long time, and you start thinking, well, what are the aspects of human nature that would lead to success in group competition? You realize in group loyalty, tribalism hierarchy, respect, ideas of purity and pollution, religion, these were crucial in binding us into cooperative groups.
This is where, I think, religious believers and conservatives are onto some truths that we, secular, liberal scientists, have a hard time accepting. They're truths nonetheless.
Recorded on May 9, 2008.
More from User
08:39
Is reality real? These neuroscientists don’t think so.
Big Think
06:37
Your reptilian brain, explained | Robert Sapolsky
Big Think
05:35
3 brain hacks to control your Amazon addiction (from a neuroscientist)
Big Think
06:36
Isolating carbon from human ashes to create diamonds
Big Think
05:28
What charity does to your brain
Big Think
05:49
How to trick your brain into saving money
Big Think
Related Videos
00:17
BGC14 Who are you? Who are We? We are that bitch
Franklinyray5656
00:17
BGC14 Who are you? Who are We? We are that bitch
Marilynvcaldwell4583
00:05
[Read Book] The Living Universe: Where Are We? Who Are We? Where Are We Going? Read Online
Maia12
05:59
Amy Winehouse Film Director Asif Kapadia: "Are We Cool With What We Do To People Who Are Messed Up, Who Have Problems?"
NME
01:39
Who are we to set the agenda , we are journalist we have to report facts not to do agenda setting , Arshad Sharif comments in NEWS EYE
Ali Usman82
02:43
Rather than distributing roses, people should communicate the true message of Islam, that is, those who are most affectionate to Muslims are those who say we are Christians
A9 TV