Hosted by Dailymotion. For legal issues report at the Copyright Center, report us on DMC, or use the Instant Removal tool.
Vetting Executive Bonuses
Description
CEO Jim Spanfeller says executive bonuses are good incentives but...
Question: What is your position on executive bonuses?
Jim Spanfeller: Well, on the one hand, clearly, the idea that folks can't make money by helping other people make money is crazy right, that's the whole system revolves around rewards for a job well done. So, executive bonuses, as a concept, we should not stamped on. However, to give bonuses to people who in fact are just the opposite and did so by taking advantage of a loop hole in the system, and in so doing hurt the system dramatically, is equally as crazy.
I think that we have every right to be outraged over some of the bonuses that have been highlighted and brought to light, after the Merrill Lynch stuff, and AIG. On the other hand, I imagined that there are a percentage, perhaps a good percentage of those people within that group that deserves those bonuses, but there's probably also a percentage of people in there that deserve not only no bonus; probably get fired.
And again, it's really hard to come in from; as a congressional committee or as the White House; although I thought the White House has a sensible reaction to this at the end of the day and try to make that determination from outside of the company.
Recorded Sep 9, 2009.
Question: What is your position on executive bonuses?
Jim Spanfeller: Well, on the one hand, clearly, the idea that folks can't make money by helping other people make money is crazy right, that's the whole system revolves around rewards for a job well done. So, executive bonuses, as a concept, we should not stamped on. However, to give bonuses to people who in fact are just the opposite and did so by taking advantage of a loop hole in the system, and in so doing hurt the system dramatically, is equally as crazy.
I think that we have every right to be outraged over some of the bonuses that have been highlighted and brought to light, after the Merrill Lynch stuff, and AIG. On the other hand, I imagined that there are a percentage, perhaps a good percentage of those people within that group that deserves those bonuses, but there's probably also a percentage of people in there that deserve not only no bonus; probably get fired.
And again, it's really hard to come in from; as a congressional committee or as the White House; although I thought the White House has a sensible reaction to this at the end of the day and try to make that determination from outside of the company.
Recorded Sep 9, 2009.
Question: What is your position on executive bonuses?
Jim Spanfeller: Well, on the one hand, clearly, the idea that folks can't make money by helping other people make money is crazy right, that's the whole system revolves around rewards for a job well done. So, executive bonuses, as a concept, we should not stamped on. However, to give bonuses to people who in fact are just the opposite and did so by taking advantage of a loop hole in the system, and in so doing hurt the system dramatically, is equally as crazy.
I think that we have every right to be outraged over some of the bonuses that have been highlighted and brought to light, after the Merrill Lynch stuff, and AIG. On the other hand, I imagined that there are a percentage, perhaps a good percentage of those people within that group that deserves those bonuses, but there's probably also a percentage of people in there that deserve not only no bonus; probably get fired.
And again, it's really hard to come in from; as a congressional committee or as the White House; although I thought the White House has a sensible reaction to this at the end of the day and try to make that determination from outside of the company.
Recorded Sep 9, 2009.
Question: What is your position on executive bonuses?
Jim Spanfeller: Well, on the one hand, clearly, the idea that folks can't make money by helping other people make money is crazy right, that's the whole system revolves around rewards for a job well done. So, executive bonuses, as a concept, we should not stamped on. However, to give bonuses to people who in fact are just the opposite and did so by taking advantage of a loop hole in the system, and in so doing hurt the system dramatically, is equally as crazy.
I think that we have every right to be outraged over some of the bonuses that have been highlighted and brought to light, after the Merrill Lynch stuff, and AIG. On the other hand, I imagined that there are a percentage, perhaps a good percentage of those people within that group that deserves those bonuses, but there's probably also a percentage of people in there that deserve not only no bonus; probably get fired.
And again, it's really hard to come in from; as a congressional committee or as the White House; although I thought the White House has a sensible reaction to this at the end of the day and try to make that determination from outside of the company.
Recorded Sep 9, 2009.
More from User
08:39
Is reality real? These neuroscientists don’t think so.
Big Think
06:37
Your reptilian brain, explained | Robert Sapolsky
Big Think
05:35
3 brain hacks to control your Amazon addiction (from a neuroscientist)
Big Think
06:36
Isolating carbon from human ashes to create diamonds
Big Think
05:28
What charity does to your brain
Big Think
05:49
How to trick your brain into saving money
Big Think
Related Videos
01:10
Trump signs ''extreme vetting'' executive order banning Syria refugees from entering the US indefinitely
euronews (in English)
05:25
Trump announces executive actions on military, 'new vetting measures' for refugees
The Washington Post
01:14
Executives at EpiPen Manufacturer Offered Huge Bonuses Tied to Profits
Veuer
05:06
Trade unionists told of collapse in real wages as shareholders’ profits and Executive bonuses trumped workers’ pay
Derry Journal
00:34
Meta is increasing executive bonuses to 200% of their base salary
Fortune
01:44
Executive Bonuses
Big Think