PANEL DISCUSSION

1. OVERALL ASSESSMENT OF THE HISTORIC ENCOUNTER

-Walk us through the Kim-Trump meeting at Panmunjeom -- from how they met to how they parted

2. SOME WERE SKEPTICAL. BUT TALKS HAVE RESUMED, AT LEAST ON THE WORKING-LEVEL. CAN WE EXPECT MORE SUBSTANCE ON THE DETAILS OF DENULCEARIZING N. KOREA FROM THIS POINT ON?

3. TO BE LED BY BIEGUN. N. KORE OPENLY DISCONTENT ABOUT BIEGUN ALONG WITH POMPEO. HOW DO YOU THINK N. KOREA WILL REACT TO THE NEWS THAT U.S. LINE OF NEGOTIATORS REMAIN UNCHANGED?

4. U.S. WILL NOT RESUME TALKS UNLESS THEY'RE READY. IF THEY'RE WILLING TO RETURN TO TABLE, DOES THIS SINGNAL THEY'RE READY TO MAKE SOME CONESSIONS?

5. -We're hearing that President Moon Jae-in was not able to join in the meeting and this Panmunjeom encounter ended up being a bilateral summit between North Korea and U.S., not a trilateral one. Did you see this coming? Were there anything that North Korean media reports have hinted?

6. -It seems like Kim Jong-un as well wanted to highlight his personal friendship with Donald Trump as much as Trump wanted. Were you able to see this in N. Korean media?

-How have the inter-Korean exchanges been up until now since the Hanoi summit?

-Tell us about the recent humanitarian assistance South Korea promised to give the North. This was obviously a move to set the atmosphere for Pyeongyang-Washington negotiations, right?

7. KEY REGIONAL PLAYERS ARE OBSERVING THIS, RUSSIA, CHINA AND JAPAN?