Hosted by Dailymotion. For legal issues report at the Copyright Center, report us on DMC, or use the Instant Removal tool.
Iraq: What's Next?
Description
We need a comprehensive, three-fold approach, Ross says.
Question: What is the way out?
Ross: I think we should be . . . I think we need a three-fold approach -- three means employed when it comes to Iraq. One is negotiate with the Iraqi government and sectarian leaders a timetable for the U.S. to withdraw, which gives them an input. But it also says we're getting out. Secondly, there should be a national reconciliation conference in parallel with this that involves also not just the national leaders in the center, but also the leaders who are being empowered by what we're doing in the local areas right now. Because you need to create a bridge between the two, and that shouldn't be disbanded until they reach an agreement. Now if they do reach agreement, we can be flexible in terms of how we approach the timetable for withdrawal. If they don't reach agreement, then we can be much less flexible in terms of how we approach withdrawal. And the third -- which should really be three parallel negotiations at once -- we should be trying to broker with the neighbors, principally like between the Saudis and the Iranians, a set of understandings at least that can contain what's going on in Iraq, because again you can play upon their mutual needs.
Question: What is the way out?
Ross: I think we should be . . . I think we need a three-fold approach -- three means employed when it comes to Iraq. One is negotiate with the Iraqi government and sectarian leaders a timetable for the U.S. to withdraw, which gives them an input. But it also says we're getting out. Secondly, there should be a national reconciliation conference in parallel with this that involves also not just the national leaders in the center, but also the leaders who are being empowered by what we're doing in the local areas right now. Because you need to create a bridge between the two, and that shouldn't be disbanded until they reach an agreement. Now if they do reach agreement, we can be flexible in terms of how we approach the timetable for withdrawal. If they don't reach agreement, then we can be much less flexible in terms of how we approach withdrawal. And the third -- which should really be three parallel negotiations at once -- we should be trying to broker with the neighbors, principally like between the Saudis and the Iranians, a set of understandings at least that can contain what's going on in Iraq, because again you can play upon their mutual needs.
Question: What is the way out?
Ross: I think we should be . . . I think we need a three-fold approach -- three means employed when it comes to Iraq. One is negotiate with the Iraqi government and sectarian leaders a timetable for the U.S. to withdraw, which gives them an input. But it also says we're getting out. Secondly, there should be a national reconciliation conference in parallel with this that involves also not just the national leaders in the center, but also the leaders who are being empowered by what we're doing in the local areas right now. Because you need to create a bridge between the two, and that shouldn't be disbanded until they reach an agreement. Now if they do reach agreement, we can be flexible in terms of how we approach the timetable for withdrawal. If they don't reach agreement, then we can be much less flexible in terms of how we approach withdrawal. And the third -- which should really be three parallel negotiations at once -- we should be trying to broker with the neighbors, principally like between the Saudis and the Iranians, a set of understandings at least that can contain what's going on in Iraq, because again you can play upon their mutual needs.
Question: What is the way out?
Ross: I think we should be . . . I think we need a three-fold approach -- three means employed when it comes to Iraq. One is negotiate with the Iraqi government and sectarian leaders a timetable for the U.S. to withdraw, which gives them an input. But it also says we're getting out. Secondly, there should be a national reconciliation conference in parallel with this that involves also not just the national leaders in the center, but also the leaders who are being empowered by what we're doing in the local areas right now. Because you need to create a bridge between the two, and that shouldn't be disbanded until they reach an agreement. Now if they do reach agreement, we can be flexible in terms of how we approach the timetable for withdrawal. If they don't reach agreement, then we can be much less flexible in terms of how we approach withdrawal. And the third -- which should really be three parallel negotiations at once -- we should be trying to broker with the neighbors, principally like between the Saudis and the Iranians, a set of understandings at least that can contain what's going on in Iraq, because again you can play upon their mutual needs.
More from User
08:39
Is reality real? These neuroscientists don’t think so.
Big Think
06:37
Your reptilian brain, explained | Robert Sapolsky
Big Think
05:35
3 brain hacks to control your Amazon addiction (from a neuroscientist)
Big Think
06:36
Isolating carbon from human ashes to create diamonds
Big Think
05:28
What charity does to your brain
Big Think
05:49
How to trick your brain into saving money
Big Think
Related Videos
01:34
Iraq: What's Next?
Big Think
04:20
After the battle, what's next for Iraq?
i24NEWS (English)
01:52
Richard Armitage on Iraq and What's Next
Big Think
01:08
Iraq: What's Next?
Big Think
01:10
What's your opinion about the photographs of US soldiers torturing prisoners in Iraq?: Interrogation In Iraq
Scribble
00:31
Full version Pivot: Turn What's Working for You Into What's Next Complete
otrosylibrosk5