Communism’s Indispensible Instinct: Terror

Anarchy and terror are an essential means employed by Marxism and communism. The founders of communism, Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, personally espoused violence and terror. Under Vladimir Lenin, who put Marx’s theory into practice, terror became an inseparable part of the communist ideology. These words of Lenin’s make this perfectly clear:

We cannot reject terror, as it is the one form of military action which may be perfectly suitable or even essential at a definite juncture in battle. (V. I., Lenin: "Where to Begin", Collected Works, Vol. 5, Moscow, 1961, p. 19)

... WHEN PEOPLE CHARGE US WITH HARSHNESS we wonder how they can forget the rudiments of Marxism. (“Speech to the All-Russia Extraordinary Commission Staff,” Collected Works, Vol. 28, pp. 169-170)

In communist thinking, war never ends. And war never ends in dialectic thinking. There is constant conflict. There is a constant struggle between opposites and blood will continue to flow until the dictatorship of the proletariat. There is no bloodless world in communist thinking. There must be blood and terror and anarchy. Communism rejects a peaceful world. (From Mr. Adnan Oktar's interview on July 22, 2011)

Oceans of blood have been shed because of communist ideology in Russia, China, Korea, Burma and Cuba; millions of people have lost their lives and as many again were injured.

In the 20th century alone, 120 million men, women, old people, children and babies lost their lives because of this cold, harsh, strict and savage ideology known as “communism.” And that is just the official figure. The true number of those who died because of communist oppression is very much higher.

Those who survived lived in a constant state of fear because communist ideology regarded terror as an indispensable weapon and obliged its followers to resort to terror. For example, this is how Lenin taught his communist comrades to perpetrate acts of terror against the troops and police officials of the state:

They must arm themselves as best they can (rifles, revolvers, bombs, knives, knuckle-dusters, sticks, rags soaked in kerosene for starting fires, ropes or rope ladders, shovels for building barricades, pyroxylin cartridges, barbed wire, nails, etc., etc.). …

Even without arms, the groups can play a most important part: 1) by leading the mass; 2) by attacking, whenever a favourable opportunity presents itself, policemen . . . and seizing their arms; 3) by rescuing the arrested or injured, when there are only few police about; 4) by getting on to the roofs or upper storeys of houses, etc., and showering stones or pouring boiling water on the troops, etc. …

… To launch attacks under favourable circumstances is not only every revolutionary’s right, but his plain duty. The killing of spies, policemen, gendarmes, the blowing up of police stations, the liberation of prisoners, the seizure of government funds for the needs of the uprising. . . every detachment of the revolutionary army must be ready to sta