Hosted by Dailymotion. For legal issues report at the Copyright Center, report us on DMC, or use the Instant Removal tool.
Brandon Adams on Learning From a Zero-Sum Game
Description
Brandon Adams says winning in business sometimes means going for broke.
Adams: Well, poker is clearly zero-sum. It's a negative-sum after we consider [rakes] and maybe living expenses, if you expand it, and so forth. Business, it is clearly positive-sum in the classic sort of economic textbook definition where we each specialize in what we are good in and we trade. If you're talking about certain types of trading activities, like Wall Street type activities, there, I mean, some of the markets are plainly zero-sum. I mean, option markets are zero-sum by construction, and most of the, well, all of the various derivative contracts and [CDS] and all these stuff is zero-sum. Now, you can get gains for both parties based on risk transfer, whereas at the poker table you can't get this. The poker table is clearly zero-sum in terms of wealth and in terms of risk transfers. The derivatives markets are zero-sum by construction, also strongly negative-sum after you consider commissions and so forth. But, even though derivatives markets are slightly negative-sum, you can get gains for both parties if you're getting risk transfer. Now, sometimes in derivative markets, you have people who just like to gamble, and so they're not, you're not getting [risk sharing], and sometimes you have derivatives used for [nefarious] purposes, like Howard points out, that sometimes the incentives between the shareholders and the agents are not properly aligned, so derivatives are just another way for the agent to gamble higher at the shareholder expense, right? If life works out, then they get a big bonus, and if it doesn't work out, then they get fired and the shareholder takes the loss. So, I think that Wall Street activities get much closer to poker in terms of being zero-sum, and obviously Main Street activities are more like economic textbook where you have clearer gains to specialization and gains to trade. And, I mean, clearly, right now there's a push for more regulation so that some of the more extreme forms of zero-sum betting that happen on Wall Street maybe get contained a bit.
Adams: Well, poker is clearly zero-sum. It's a negative-sum after we consider [rakes] and maybe living expenses, if you expand it, and so forth. Business, it is clearly positive-sum in the classic sort of economic textbook definition where we each specialize in what we are good in and we trade. If you're talking about certain types of trading activities, like Wall Street type activities, there, I mean, some of the markets are plainly zero-sum. I mean, option markets are zero-sum by construction, and most of the, well, all of the various derivative contracts and [CDS] and all these stuff is zero-sum. Now, you can get gains for both parties based on risk transfer, whereas at the poker table you can't get this. The poker table is clearly zero-sum in terms of wealth and in terms of risk transfers. The derivatives markets are zero-sum by construction, also strongly negative-sum after you consider commissions and so forth. But, even though derivatives markets are slightly negative-sum, you can get gains for both parties if you're getting risk transfer. Now, sometimes in derivative markets, you have people who just like to gamble, and so they're not, you're not getting [risk sharing], and sometimes you have derivatives used for [nefarious] purposes, like Howard points out, that sometimes the incentives between the shareholders and the agents are not properly aligned, so derivatives are just another way for the agent to gamble higher at the shareholder expense, right? If life works out, then they get a big bonus, and if it doesn't work out, then they get fired and the shareholder takes the loss. So, I think that Wall Street activities get much closer to poker in terms of being zero-sum, and obviously Main Street activities are more like economic textbook where you have clearer gains to specialization and gains to trade. And, I mean, clearly, right now there's a push for more regulation so that some of the more extreme forms of zero-sum betting that happen on Wall Street maybe get contained a bit.
More from User
08:39
Is reality real? These neuroscientists don’t think so.
Big Think
06:37
Your reptilian brain, explained | Robert Sapolsky
Big Think
05:35
3 brain hacks to control your Amazon addiction (from a neuroscientist)
Big Think
06:36
Isolating carbon from human ashes to create diamonds
Big Think
05:28
What charity does to your brain
Big Think
05:49
How to trick your brain into saving money
Big Think
Related Videos
09:21
Schools Closures (Part 1) - Safety Vs Learning, Zero Sum Game?
AWANI
05:04
If the sum of a,b and c is zero, sum of their cubes = 3 times product of a,b and c
Arinjay Jain Academy
01:31
Brandons 2010 - Sum sur le giratoire...
lespedz
12:10
Lets Play! WWE 2K15 - MyCareer Mode! (Brandon Sum) Part 2
Eugene Daryl
01:27
Online High Stakes Poker-Brandon Adams
adelgil
00:50
Billie Eilish's ex Brandon 'Q' Adams' addresses split for the first time
Bang Showbiz