Hosted by Dailymotion. For legal issues report at the Copyright Center, report us on DMC, or use the Instant Removal tool.
Brandon Adams on Balancing Consistency and Unpredictability
Description
Brandon Adams believes that a steady hand and occasional curve ball can mean walking away a winner.
Adams: Clearly you can't be a poker player who takes actions on a consistent basis. You have to mix things up intelligently. That said, for any given hand, there is probably a correct strategy if you view that hand in isolation, and often, if you're going to take a play other than that, then you're costing yourself something on that particular hand or to the benefit of subsequent hands, and you basically have to asses if what you're costing yourself on that hand is worth it in terms of what you will gain in subsequent hands. So, for instance, if one player limps and then another player limps and I have aces, and I decide to limp, I know that's the wrong play on that isolated hand. That just has to be wrong. It's better to raise, and that, in particular, is a somewhat weird play that is going to cost you a good bit of money in expectation on that particular hand. So, if you engage in that play, you have to decide whether the various benefits of limping in that particular situation will provide enough value for you down the road by, for instance, making opponents a little bit more leery when you decide to limp behind or, you know, make your opponents a little bit scared to, like, put in various [steal] raises in [late position] or whatever. You have to decide if the benefits in those subsequent hands are worth what you're costing yourself in that hand. It's not clear what you should do.
Adams: Clearly you can't be a poker player who takes actions on a consistent basis. You have to mix things up intelligently. That said, for any given hand, there is probably a correct strategy if you view that hand in isolation, and often, if you're going to take a play other than that, then you're costing yourself something on that particular hand or to the benefit of subsequent hands, and you basically have to asses if what you're costing yourself on that hand is worth it in terms of what you will gain in subsequent hands. So, for instance, if one player limps and then another player limps and I have aces, and I decide to limp, I know that's the wrong play on that isolated hand. That just has to be wrong. It's better to raise, and that, in particular, is a somewhat weird play that is going to cost you a good bit of money in expectation on that particular hand. So, if you engage in that play, you have to decide whether the various benefits of limping in that particular situation will provide enough value for you down the road by, for instance, making opponents a little bit more leery when you decide to limp behind or, you know, make your opponents a little bit scared to, like, put in various [steal] raises in [late position] or whatever. You have to decide if the benefits in those subsequent hands are worth what you're costing yourself in that hand. It's not clear what you should do.
More from User
08:39
Is reality real? These neuroscientists don’t think so.
Big Think
06:37
Your reptilian brain, explained | Robert Sapolsky
Big Think
05:35
3 brain hacks to control your Amazon addiction (from a neuroscientist)
Big Think
06:36
Isolating carbon from human ashes to create diamonds
Big Think
05:28
What charity does to your brain
Big Think
05:49
How to trick your brain into saving money
Big Think
Related Videos
05:04
Detroit bullpen's secret: unpredictability
FAN BOTS
04:13
Brand Equity - Managing Unpredictability across life and business
ET NOW
02:24
Lukashenko's 'unpredictability' a problem for Moscow as Belarus strongman looks east
Africanews (in English)
34:08
EEVblog 1377 - The Amazing UNPREDICTABILITY of Fuses!
EEVblog
05:11
Unpredictability hitting US and UK economies
Infinity Zone
01:35
Bung’s ‘unpredictability’ complicates BN-PH alliance in Sabah, says analyst
Free Malaysia Today